Friday, 8 February 2013



delegation led by Lt Col Inderjit Singh, Chairman and comprising Brig 
Bhagwan Singh Secy Gen and Air Cmdre Sushil Soni met the RM on 02 Feb at
his residence.

After the exchange of pleasantries we presented 
him an invitation to come to Satara near Pune, for the third part of 
our 30th Anniversary Celebrations in which the second of the ten 
TAILORING CENTERs will be inaugurated. He expressed his inability to 
attend but wished us all success.

To start with we thanked him 
for all that he did for us in the recent 
months and requested him to take up our problems, especially OROP, even 
more strongly so 
that these are resolved expeditiously. He assured that he would get us 
to our final goal, but it will have to be done gradually so that we do 
not raise others hackles. The letters about our problems were presented 
to him one by one for consideration and his necessary action. All these 
letters follow after the end of this preliminary note.

Meeting was free and frank in which we put up all our points with all 
the force at our Command. He listened to our submissions very patiently 
even when some serious fault was pointed out and after listening gave us
his opinion. 

Talking about CSD takeover, he stated that URCs 
are with Services and not with MoD: It meant that control 
of central office of CSD at Mumbai had been taken over by MoD resulting
in management shifting to MoD from Army HQ, but user end
sales are with Services, why should there be any problems. When we 
pointed out that due to complicated procedures and consequent inordinate
delay the goods are not getting to the URC on time, he promised to look
into the matter.

When we brought to his notice the mischief of 
the bureaucrats in issuing the notification against the spirit of the 
Judgement the Rank Pay case he seemed very disturbed. After explaining 
we appealed to him that the notification be withdrawn and fresh desired 
notification be issued. He promised to look into it.

We spoke 
about the ECHS and apprised him about two groups that have emerged after
ten years of ECHS operations. One which is fully satisfied. Such people
are in miniscule minority but are influential veterans. The other group
is totally dis-satisfied with ECHS. This comprises 90 % of veterans. To
satisfy both the groups we have to think differently. The answer is 
that without disturbing the present set up we give a try to the Medicare
Policy scheme in areas where we are setting up new 199 polyclinics. 
Once we get a feed back then we can take a final call on what schemme 
was suitable. He listened to all this and assured that he would look 
into it.

When we submitted the matter about 33 years 
conditionality removal ha stated that they were removing this problem 
gradually. We then stated that was nothing but daylight robbery and must 
be removed without delay, he said that he would look into it.

We submitted that all Notifications issued by the MOD are flawed. While 
giving us something, the notifications invariably deprive us of 
something even better. This is corroborated by the fact that there are 
5,000.00 petitions in the AFT. Of these there are 3500 cases which are 
being appealed by the MOD against the Judgements given in our favor. The
tragedy was that the MOD which should have been taking up our causes to
make our life better was opposing and appealing against our interest in
all those cases.

Then we narrated him the case in which our Secy
ESM Deptt in his desperation to scuttle another initiative for OROP 
stated that Veterans were demanding annual increments in pensions, which
was making it difficult for them to concede this demand. We also told 
him that if the MOD which should be taking up our issue and getting 
these through was strongly opposing the same, how could we get anything 
from the Govt.

We then told him that unless the basic 
shortcomings in the functioning and structure of ESM Deptt are addressed
no amount of effort by him to put matters right are likely to work. The
bureaucracy will continue to mislead the leadership with their blatant 
lies to ensure rejection of our submissions. 

The points regarding renewal of licenses and reduction of age limits for allotment of security contracts was also taken up.

Before we parted he
promised to have these matters re examined and get back. He also 
advised that we should brief the RRM as well so that he knows that we 
are facing these problems.

Warm regards

Lt Col Inderjit Singh

No comments:

Post a comment