Thursday, 19 March 2015

Dear All,

More clear picture of SC ruling regarding Arrears from 1-1-2006 is given by Navdeep in his blog

http://www.indianmilitary.info/

Regards
bhinder

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Pay arrears of pension to all Pre-2006 retiree Central Govt pensioners from 01 January 2006 rather than 24 September 2012 : Supreme Court

As most readers would know, there were anomalies in the fixation of pension of pre-2006 central govt retirees with effect from 01 Jan 2006 and the question was whether pension was to be calculated based on the minimum of each grade/rank within the newly introduced pay-bands or on the minimum of the pay-band itself. The said anomaly was resolved by way of judgements of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) as well as Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) which inter alia ruled that pension would be calculated on the basis of minima of each rank/grade within the pay-band. The judgement of the CAT was challenged by the Govt before the Delhi High Court. In the meantime however, the Govt itself removed the anomaly but granted the benefits from 24 Sept 2012 rather than 01 Jan 2006 which was the date of the inception of the anomaly.

Hence the exact controversy now stood narrowed down to whether the benefits of the correct pension were to flow from 01 Jan 2006 which was the date from which the 6th Central Pay Commission recommendations were implemented or from 24 Sept 2012 which was when the Govt had decided to remove the anomalies in the pension structure after the said Pay Commission.

The controversy was finally resolved by the Delhi High Court which directed that after removal of the anomaly, the pension arrears were to flow from 01 Jan 2006 and not from the future artificial date of 24 Sep 2012. Never to respect well-rounded judicial verdicts, the Govt challenged the decision of the High Court before the Supreme Court, however the Supreme Court was pleased to dismiss the SLP filed by the Govt in July 2013. The Govt then filed a review petition followed by a curative petition alleging ‘gross miscarriage of justice’ but a 5 Judge Bench dismissed the curative petition too.

The Govt however did not implement the decision across the board and kept filing SLPs and Civil Appeals across the board against decisions of judicial fora in favour of pensioners.

Ultimately, all these cases were clubbed together and were finally heard today by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court has today dismissed all appeals filed by the Union of India and upheld the decision of grant of arrears with effect from 01 January 2006 rather than 24 September 2012.

Another closure to another agony.
The amount of basic pension which was made admissible from 24 September 2012 for each rank can be discerned from this Circular issued by the Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pensions). The said amount plus applicable DA/DR would now be admissible from 01 January 2006.

Posted by Navdeep / Maj Navdeep Singh at 3:12 PM 0 comments

Wednesday, 18 March 2015

Dear Friends,

Army Chief Gen Dalbir Singh Suhag visited Jhajhar on 14 Mar 2015. He addressed a big gathering of Veterans and their families. In his address he gave a detailed account of the latest position about OROP. This will be announced by 30 Apr. You can relax now.

It is a matter of great relief to me that a matter that I took up with the PM on 22 Feb 1982 has finally materialised after 33 years.

While this has come through there are many more things that, if not rectified soon enough, would land us in the same situation. Capt Chattar Singh our Vice Chairman along with Capt Balwan Singh, Sub Mohiinder Singh met the Chief and handed him over three letters from me with regard to these issues. He assured that he will look into these.

The letters handed over are given below for your info.

With warm regards

Lt Col Inderjit Singh
Chairman
09811007629



LETTER NO 1

I would have liked to personally come and greet you but can not do so as I am laid up with a stroke.

2. I thank you on behalf of the country’s Veterans for the keen interest you took in having our long standing demand of OROP through. We had first time put it across to the Prime Minister on 22 Feb 1982. Ever since we have been struggling to achieve it. In this process got five PMs to agree and twice actually got it. Every time we had it going the next opportunity the Babus took it away. This time also they tried to wriggle out of it but could not do so because of the strong backing of three Chiefs. Moral of the story is that ‘we can win any battle together’.

3. Let us heave together in future for getting for Armed Forces the rightful place in the Society.


LETTER NO 2


Now that the OROP has been conceded let us put our shoulders together to tackle those issues that are responsible for our present state.

2. Our problem is not lack of good will of the leadership, it is the inimical elements. Imagine
the MOD which is there to look after our interests to ensure for us the best, is the one which is opposing every thing that is good for us. The problem of lack of our communication with the leadership is what is needed to be addressed if you want to achieve anything on permanent basis.

3. This can not happen by off and on issuing orders to this effect. This can only happen by placing instruments on ground. The instruments that need to be established for ensuring regular institutionalised inter action are given below :-

a) Standing Committee of Voluntary Associations (SCOVA).
b) Department of Ex-servicemen Welfare.
c) Representation of Armed Forces at the MOD.
d) The Armed Forces Tribunal.
e) The Ex-servicemen Resettlement Commission.

4. I had written to the Prime Minister about these issues on 01 Jul 2014. He has very kindly taken a very serious note of my request and conceded SCOVA. Ex-servicemen Commission he had accepted through his Manifesto.

Accepted Issues

5. Of these he has very kindly accepted to appoint SCOVA and Ex-servicemen Commission. While to work out the charter for Commission, consultations are going on at various levels, there is no news about SCOVA. The Babus have been stonewalling this for the last 25 years. They are not going to concede it easily unless Service HQ keep track of it. In 1991 I got it going in the MOD. The Babus finding it too hot for their liking, they quickly wound it up.

Separate Pay Commission

6. Soon after Fifth CPC, I realised that we can not get our rightful due unless we have our Separate Pay Commission. I pursued it relentlessly ever since. In 2013 it was conceded. It took 15 Years of my struggle to get it, but the Chiefs in their wisdom rejected it. You may consider taking it up for allowing this again.

Department of Ex-servicemen Welfare

7. This Department was set up by the leadership in their wisdom to ensure that the problems of veterans could be taken care of with greater authority and effect. Unfortunately rather than use their additional authority to solve our problems the bureaucrats running the Department are instead misusing their powers to create even more difficult problems.

8. What is required is the restructuring of this Department with the staff being a mix of serving and retired soldiers of the Armed Force. This would to a great extent help in solving rather than creating problems for Veterans, which is happening now.

Representation of Armed Forces at the MOD

9. I am sure you are aware that the Armed Force are the only uniformed Service which has no representation at the decision making level in the controlling Ministry. Why? Are the Armed Forces untrustworthy or are they incompetent to handle their own affairs? It is neither. It is the fear of a coup that the bureaucracy has been creating in the minds of the leadership regularly that has resulted in total trust deficit. This kind of an attitude rather than prevent it, is a sure shot recipe for disaster.

10. This situation must be quickly reversed by placing Armed Forces officers at various decision making levels in the MOD. This will automatically ensure consultation and participation of the Armed Forces in all matters pertaining to them as per Prime Minister’s noble desire.

The Armed Forces Tribunal

11. The Veterans had been subjected to all along with problems emerging out of flawed order or their wrong implementation. Some Veterans who refuse to accept the injustice go to the Courts for reprieve. That is when their trouble begins. If they get favourable decision from one Court the Govt drags them to the next higher Court. This process goes on till they are dead. When the orders come neither they are there nor are their problems.
3
12. The Leadership realising these difficulties decided to set up an Armed Forces Tribunal so that they could get a quick redressal of their grievances through judicial intervention if they could not get reprieve elsewhere.

13. Ever since the AFT was appointed in 2009 around ten thousand cases have been filed by serving soldiers and Veterans. Majority of these cases have been decided in favour of these suffering Armed Forces Personnel and veterans. Almost in all those cases the MOD through Deptt of ESW have gone in for Appeal in higher Courts. The Armed forces agony has been prolonged by creating another level of judicial intervention rather than reducing it.

14. This has happened because the AFT has been placed under MOD and has been made toothless. The matter needs to be attended to by placing them under Ministry of Law and giving them all the powers of a High Court. Finally MOD be directed to treat all orders of the AFT as final unless there is serious violation of the Constitutional provisions.

15. The number of cases filed should be a matter of serious alarm for the leadership.  The inimical elements to prejudice the minds of the leadership will project this phenomenon as a revolt against the Govt by the Veterans. In actual fact it is indicative of their malafide intentions for denying us our rightful dues at such an enormous scale. To tell you in simple words the actual situation? Almost every notification of any consequence, issued by the MOD is flawed and which denies us our rightful dues or takes away already granted facilities.

The Ex-servicemen Resettlement Commission

16. We are delighted that this all important instrument for Veterans welfare has already been announced by the President in his address to the Joint Session of the Parliament. This was first recommended by the High Level Committee headed by RRM, of which I was a Special Invitee, way back in 1984. The bureaucracy has been stalling it all this time.

17. What is required now is to keep a close watch on terms and conditions that are being worked out. The Babus should not be allowed to turn this also a toothless wonder like AFT.


LETTER NO 3

A large number of Majors and Lt Col SG have been denied their rightful dues consequent to the decisions of various committees and CPC.

2. I submit details about the case of Majors pensions in brief, that would help you in not only understanding the problem fully but also for ensuring that the right remedial measures are adopted for working out proper solution to this very serious problem The problem of Lt Cols being the same, their case has also been included for your consideration and necessary action please.

Brief History 

3. Till the Fifth CPC, for fixation of pay of the officers of the rank of Major belonging to all categories were treated alike viz there was no difference between the pay of acting or substantive majors at starting level. Further both the officers of the General list and SL List (Special duty list in Navy) were fixed at the same scale of pay viz Rs 11600-325-14850.


4. From 29 Feb 2000 vide Ministry of Defence letter No 1 (26)/97/II/D(pay/services) dated 29 Feb 2000, the officers of the above rank were arbitrarily split into various categories. as stated below:-

(a) General list officer(Acting Major) drawing starting salary of Rs 11600.
(b) SL List Officers (Substantive Major) drawing starting salary of Rs 11925.
(c) All officers holding rank of Major who retired prior to 29 Feb 2000 drawing starting salary  of Rs 11600.
(d) Officers holding acting rank of Major who retired after 2000 drawing 
starting  salary of Rs  1600.
(e) Officers holding substantive rank of Major who retired after 2000 drawing 
salary of Rs    11925.
(g) Since Special list officers were granted substantive rank they started drawing more pay than the General list officers at starting level itself. 


5. The recent decision of the Government to grant the Major with 21 yrs of service the pension equal to that of the Lt Col(TS) has created another class within the above rank, making matters more complicated for future. It has been done presumably on the basis of DSRs which lays this down. This regulation had become infructuous with the Govt order No 18(I) 2004-D(GS-1) dated 21st December 2004 due to which all majors became substantive Major with six years service and Lt Col with thirteen years service with effect from 16 Dec 2004. 


Status After 2004


6. With the announcement of the Govt. order No 18(I) 2004-D(GS-1) dated 21st December 2004 all majors will now retire with pensions of a Lt Col (TS) as after putting in service for 13 years they will get the rank of a Lt Col. This should have been the yardstick for the latest award of Lt Cols pension to Majors rather than the DSR norm, which has no meaning under the changed circumstances. This very pension of Lt Col (TS) has been given to earlier selection grade Lt Cols after the Sixth CPC award. This tantamounts to downgrading the selection grade Lt Col.

Position After Sixth CPC

7. Taking this situation into consideration the Sixth CPC placed all Majors and Lt Cols in Pay Band three. While doing this they totally ignored the situation that prevailed pre 16 Dec 2004 when a Major became substantive with 13 years service and many more years to become Lt Col. The duties performed by a major were as a Coy commander and a Lt Col as a Battalion Commander. These duties are now being performed by Lt Col and Colonel.

8. After some representation by the AFs, Lt Col has been placed in PB 4 and a major with 21 years service been given Lt Cols (TS) pension. In this the Majors with 20 years minimum qualifying pensionable service have been left out, by what logic we can not think of except the fervent desires of the vested interests to do down AFs. Similarly the selection grade Lt Cols of yore have been brought down to the level of Lt Cols (TS) by giving them the pensions of present day Lt Cols(TS).


Action Required


9. The immediate need of the hour is that the pensions of all pre 2004 Majors and Lt Cols be upgraded keeping in view the duties by their equivalent ranks now and not the ranks held.

10. Majors Rank. In that the Majors who retired with 20 years of minimum qualifying pensionable service or more to be given the pensions of a Lt Col (TS) as has been rightly done for Majors with 21 years service. By what logic the Major with 20 years have been deprived of the pensions of Lt Col (TS) needs to be investigated and those responsible made accountable for their misdeeds.


11. Lt Col Rank. The case of Lt Col is simpler as there were only two categories. The time scaled and the other, selection grade one. While Lt Col (TS) has been suitably compensated by bringing him to PB 4, the Lt Col selection grade has been down graded by giving him the scales of Lt Col (TS) rather than those of Colonels who are now commanding the Battalions which were commanded by Lt Cols earlier. All Lt Cols selection grades need to be given the scales of Colonels in the PB 4 to remove this problem.

Applicability Date


12. The GOI/MOD has decided to apply the notification regarding latest award wef 24.9.12 (instead of 01.1.06) in spite of the fact that just about 45 days earlier to it, the Hon’ble Minister of State (Min. of Finance) in reply to an unstarred question (no. 191) had stated on the floor of the Rajya Sabha on 9.8.12 that “The 13th Finance Commission had recommended that structural shocks such as arrears arising out of Pay Commission awards should be avoided by making the pay award commence from the date on which it is accepted.” The date of applicability of this award therefore should be wef 01. 01. 2006 as per this announcement.


Solution

13. In definite terms what we seek is given below:-

a) All Majors with minimum 20 years qualifying pensionable service or more to be given the pensions of Lt Col (TS). 
b) All Lt Col Selection Grade who commanded Battalions or their equivalent units in their arm or service to be given the scales of full Colonels.
c) The date of applicability should be 01.01.2006 

15. Now that these problems have been brought to your kind notice, we look forward to your indulgence in solving these soon as submitted.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One Rank One Pension to be approved by April end: Army Chief

Jhajjar: Army Chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag on Saturday said that the long-standing demand of Armed Forces veterans' for One Rank One Pension (OROP) will be approved by April end.

The file on the OROP is currently being studied by the Finance wing of the Defence Ministry after which it would be sent to the Finance Ministry for final approval.

The government has already made it clear that the OROP will be implemented with effect from April 1, 2014.

Addressing a rally of around 17,000 ex-servicemen here, the Army Chief said, "The OROP will come out in the same principle as desired. It will be effective from April 1, 2014 and may be approved latest by April 30 this year. However, delay does not matter as arrears will be given."

The OROP scheme, which seeks to ensure that a uniform pension is paid to defence personnel who retire at the same rank with the same length of service, irrespective of their date of retirement, has been a long-standing demand of the over two million ex-servicemen in the country.

In view of the hardships faced by the soldiers while discharging their duties, Gen Singh has sought a hike in their pay and allowances from the Prime Minister, a defence statement said.
Singh said that the army has tied up with the Skilled Development ministry for ensuring employment to the Army retirees in public and private sectors, it said.

However, the Army Chief ruled out the possibilities of exempting the veterans from income tax as it would be a violation of the principal of parity, the statement added.

A number of grievance resolution stalls were set up to process on-the-spot redressal of grievances pertaining to pension, preparation of ECHS cards and CSD cards, it said.

A medical camp was also organised in which specialists from various discipline of medicine attended the needy patients.

Besides, 26 modified scooters and six wheel chairs were given to the eligible ex-servicemen, the statement added.

PTI

Breaking News:ALL PRE-2006 PENSIONERS

Pay arrears of pension to all Pre-2006 retiree Central Govt pensioners from 01 January 2006 rather than 24 September 2012 : Supreme Court

There were anomalies in the fixation of pension of pre-2006 central govt retirees with effect from 01 Jan 2006 and the question was whether pension was to be calculated based on the minimum of each grade/rank within the newly introduced pay-bands or on the minimum of the pay-band itself. The said anomaly was resolved by way of judgements of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) as well as Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) which inter alia ruled that pension would be calculated on the basis of minima of each rank/grade within the pay-band. The judgement of the CAT was challenged by the Govt before the Delhi High Court. In the meantime however, the Govt itself removed the anomaly but granted the benefits from 24 Sept 2012 rather than 01 Jan 2006 which was the date of the inception of the anomaly.

Hence the exact controversy now stood narrowed down to whether the benefits of the correct pension were to flow from 01 Jan 2006 which was the date from which the 6th Central Pay Commission recommendations were implemented or from 24 Sept 2012 which was when the Govt had decided to remove the anomalies in the pension structure after the said Pay Commission.

The controversy was finally resolved by the Delhi High Court which directed that after removal of the anomaly, the pension arrears were to flow from 01 Jan 2006 and not from the future artificial date of 24 Sep 2012. Never to respect well-rounded judicial verdicts, the Govt challenged the decision of the High Court before the Supreme Court, however the Supreme Court was pleased to dismiss the SLP filed by the Govt in July 2013. The Govt then filed a review petition followed by a curative petition alleging ‘gross miscarriage of justice’ but a 5 Judge Bench dismissed the curative petition too.
The Govt however did not implement the decision across the board and kept filing SLPs and Civil Appeals across the board against decisions of judicial fora in favour of pensioners.

Ultimately, all these cases were clubbed together and were finally heard today by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court has today dismissed all appeals filed by the Union of India and upheld the decision of grant of arrears with effect from 01 January 2006 rather than 24 September 2012.

Saturday, 14 March 2015

New Motor Vehicle Act Passed on 11 March in Rajya Sabha.

Offence Fine


Four Wheeler

Without Belt Rs. 1000
Without PUC Rs. 1500
Without Insurance Rs. 10000
Without paper Rs. 5000 and impound

Without license Rs. 10000 and vehicle impound

All original papers should be taken along while Driving

Mobile while driving Rs. 5000
Drunken Driving Rs. 25000
Three time Memo & License japt in both two and four wheelers.
After 3rd time of such offence, license stands cancelled pan India.

Effective from tomorrow
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Defence
13-March-2015 13:37 IST
One Rank One Pension Scheme

The principle of One Rank One Pension for the Armed Forces has been accepted by the Government. The modalities for implementation have been discussed with various stakeholders and are presently under consideration of the Government. Financial implication could be calculated, once the modalities are finalized and approved by the Government.

Possible amendments to the pension policies are being examined with a view to reduce litigation for removing disparities in pension of various ex-servicemen.

This information was given by Defence Minister Shri Manohar Parrikar in a written reply to Shri Mullappally Ramachandran and others in Lok Sabha today.

Thursday, 12 March 2015

PCDA CALL CENTRE ESTABLISHED

You may now contact PCDA by using the Toll free number : 18001805321 

For facilitating proper response please keep following intimation ready for submission to the Pension Call Center executive:-

1. PPO No.
2. IC No. / Reg. No.
3. Name of Pensioner / Family Pensioner
4. Date of retirement / discharge / death
5. Brief of points on which information / clarification requires.

Tuesday, 10 March 2015

Revision of Pension of Pre-2006 Pensioners – Pensioners Orders

No.38/77-A/09-P&PW(A)(Pt.)

Government of India
Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pensions
Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare

Lok Nayak Bhawan,
Khan Market, New Delhi-110003
Dated the 5th March, 2015

Office Memorandum

Sub:- Revision of pension of pre-2006 pensioners – reg.


The orders for implementation of the decision taken by the Government on the recommendations of 6th CPC for revision for pension of past pensioners were issued vide Department of Pension & Pensioners’ Welfare’s OM dated 1.9.2008. The provisions of Para 4.2 of this OM were clarified vide this Department’s letter dated 3.10.2008.

2. The Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in its common order dated 1.11.2011 in four petitions [OA No.655/2010, 306/2010, 50712010 and 3079/2009] directed that the past pensioners may be granted, w.e.f. 1.1.2006, a minimum pension with reference to the fitment table applicable for revision of pay of serving employees.

3. A large number of representations from pre-2006 pensioners are being received by the Department of Pension & Pensioners’ Welfare for extension of benefits similar to what had been allowed in case of OA No.655/2010 by CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi.

4. In this context, it is informed that four Writ Petitions were filed in the High Court of Delhi challenging the order dated 1.11.2011 of Hon’ble CAT in four OAs. These petitions were dismissed on 29.4.2013. Subsequently, four SLPs were filed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court over a period of time against the said order of the Hon’ble High Court. Of the four SLPs, the one pertaining to Central Government SAG (S-29) Pensioners’ Association which was first in the series of said SLPs, has since been dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 29.7.2013. As the Review Curative Petition against the said order dated 29.7.2013 also failed, the Government of India decided to comply with the order by extending the requisite benefits to the parties involved in the said SLP. As regards the other three SLPs (Nos.36148-50/2013), Hon’ble Supreme Court in its order dated 19.11.2013 issued notice and made the following observation: .
“Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that during the pendency of these petitions the respondent-writ petitioners shall not precipitate the matter by filing contempt proceedings either before the High Court or before the Tribunal. That statement is recorded."

5. Thus the issue of revision of pension of pre-2006 pensioners w.e.f. 1.1.2006 as covered under SLP Nos. 36148-50/2013 in the Apex Court which have been tagged with Civil Appeal No.8875-76/2011 filed by Ministry of Defence in a similar matter is subjudice.

6. This is for information

7. The outcome of SLPs under reference in Para (4) would be brought to the notice of all Ministries/Departments.

(S.K.Makkar)
Under Secretary to the Government of India